War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite
War Of The Encyclopaedists: A Novel, By Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite. In undergoing this life, many individuals always attempt to do and obtain the finest. New expertise, encounter, lesson, as well as every little thing that can improve the life will be done. However, several individuals often really feel confused to get those things. Feeling the restricted of encounter as well as resources to be far better is one of the lacks to own. Nonetheless, there is a quite easy point that can be done. This is exactly what your educator consistently manoeuvres you to do this one. Yeah, reading is the response. Reading an e-book as this War Of The Encyclopaedists: A Novel, By Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite and other recommendations can enhance your life quality. How can it be?
War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite
PDF Ebook Download : War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite
In a superb, rare literary collaboration, two major new talents join their voices to tell the story of a generation at a crossroads, and a friendship that stretches over continents and crises—from the liberal arena of Boston academia to the military occupation of Iraq—in this ambitious and electrifying debut novel.On a summer night, in the arty enclave of Capitol Hill, Seattle, best friends Mickey Montauk and Halifax Corderoy throw one last blowout party before their lives part ways. At twenty-three, they had planned to move together to Boston for graduate school, but global events have intervened: Montauk has just learned that his National Guard unit will deploy to Baghdad at the end of the summer. In the confusion of this altered future, Corderoy is faced with a moral dilemma: his girlfriend Mani has just been evicted and he must decide whether or not to abandon her when she needs him most. He turns to Montauk for help. His decision that night, and its harrowing outcome, sets in motion a year that will transform all three of them. Months later, Corderoy and Montauk grapple with their new identities as each deals with his own muted disappointment. In Boston, Corderoy finds himself unable to play the game of intellectual one-upmanship with the ease and grace of his new roommate Tricia, a Harvard graduate student and budding human rights activist. Half a world away, in Baghdad, Montauk struggles to lead his platoon safely through an increasingly violent and irrational war. As their lives move further away from their shared dream, Corderoy and Montauk keep in touch with one another by editing a Wikipedia article about themselves: smart and funny updates that morph and deepen throughout the year, culminating in a document that is both devastatingly tragic and profoundly poetic. Fast-moving and compulsively readable, War of the Encyclopaedists beats with the energetic pulse of idealistic youth on the threshold of adult reality. "A wise and wise-assed first novel...with sweep and heart and humor" (Mary Karr, author of Liar's Club and Lit) it is the vital, urgent, and utterly absorbing lament of a new generation searching for meaning and hope in a fractured world.
War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite- Amazon Sales Rank: #529674 in eBooks
- Published on: 2015-05-19
- Released on: 2015-05-19
- Format: Kindle eBook
Amazon.com Review Guest Interview – Christopher Robinson and Gavin Kovite in conversation with Phil Klay
Phil Klay: War literature often gives only minimal notice to the experience of women, but your two main characters are balanced by two fascinating women who become involved in both of their stories. How did you come up with Mani and Tricia?
Chris: In the earliest drafts, Tricia began as a foil to Hal, the character based on me. She was pretentious, overly PC, annoying. Her function was to highlight all the things Hal hated about Boston. She wasn't compelling and her being used as prop made Hal less compelling.
Gavin: As we rewrote and rewrote the novel, one of our main goals was to make it just as likely that a reader would identify with Tricia as with Hal or Mickey. Tricia went from being the villain of the book to being the hero, at least for me. She’s my favorite character.
Chris: Mani, too, went through a lot of revision. She was initially too defined by her victimhood, which we didn’t want. As her character evolved through rewrites, she became less of a victim and more and more of an actor; her choices started driving the plot for the other characters. And I think we both became more fascinated by her, and how she handles those power dynamics.
Phil Klay: Esquire said War of the Encyclopaedists may be the "defining novel" of the millennial generation. Do you consider that a backhanded compliment?
Chris: [laughs]
Phil: Seriously, though, we’re you consciously trying to write about millennials? What do you think defines the millennial experience?
Gavin: It’s a forehanded compliment, and a very flattering review. I’m still just so happy that some people are enjoying the book. We’re on the front cusp of the millennial generation, but I think much of what makes millennials millennials in the popular mind applies to us, and to the characters in WotE. In 2004, none of us really knew what we were expected to do, other than graduate from college. College graduation was the end of the marked path, and almost everyone I knew was lost afterwards. People applied for jobs and travelled a bit and supported themselves, but no one was starting some big career or a family or saving the world—it was this widespread feeling of deflatedness. My post-graduate malaise was pretty bad, in part because I had to go through it alone; I deployed during my senior year, and by the time I got back my friends had graduated and moved on. I had had this intense and disorienting experience as a platoon leader, and was married—
Phil Klay: A deployment marriage?
Gavin:Not like in the book. In real life, we were very much a couple and in love. But when I got back I was just emotionally fried. All I wanted to do was spend another few years as a college kid before I had to grow up and figure things out. The Rome trip, where I met Chris, was a godsend. Unlike many other people, Chris didn’t treat me any differently for being a vet, which I was so grateful for; it was just a stream of dumb jokes and clever immaturity, which was what I needed at the time.
Chris: You know, you never told me that before, Gav. That’s nice. I think it was just obliviousness to your vet status on my part, rather than tact. But to get back to your question, Phil, the funny thing is, we actually were trying to write about millennials, though neither of ever thought of ourselves as millennials until the TV told us we were. The very first outline of War of the Encyclopaedists had something of a mission statement in it: to capture one side of the Iraq War through the separation of friends, to explore our generation’s need to self-create and its embracing of subjectivity through YouTube, Facebook, and of course, Wikipedia. We largely ignored that mission statement as we wrote the book. Forgot about it, even. Four years later, we dug up that first outline on a whim and saw that we’d actually written something which came close to fulfilling the original mission statement. But it didn’t feel like we’d done it. If WotE is a book for the millennial generation, it’s because we let our characters drive the plot. It was their attempts to define themselves, and their shared feeling that a self-definition is the only valid definition.
Phil Klay: You were also explicitly writing about war. How does the Iraq War, as depicted here, differ from what people might expect to find?
Gavin: For one thing, “war” is a misnomer for my deployment experience—I served in an occupation. I know now as a military lawyer that occupation was in fact required under humanitarian law, and that it gave us, the occupying force, certain legal rights and responsibilities. All I knew at the time was that our job was to screen and defend the Green Zone. We tried to be as respectful and friendly to the locals as possible while effectively deterring and blocking attacks. Keeping a good relationship with the locals was central to our security plan, and either it worked or we just got lucky. We still took mortar rounds and drive-by shootings on a somewhat regular basis, but none of us got hurt. I felt more like a cop in a bad neighborhood than a combat soldier in enemy territory.
So the occupation stories in WotE are very unlike, say, American Sniper or Lone Survivor or any of those hellacious combat tales that take up a lot of popular bandwidth, for obvious reasons. We weren’t fighting the Iraqis, we were trying to protect them from the criminals and extremists in their midst. There were bright points, like the elections and handover of sovereignty that happened on our watch, but it was depressingly clear to us as we were winding up our deployment in spring 2005 that the city was slipping deeper into a state of violence and fear. It was heartbreaking to watch. I stopped reading the news after I got back because I didn’t want think about my neighborhood being bombed and shot up. Things got really bad between ’05-’07 before they started turning it around.
Chris: From the beginning, we’d planned to juxtapose Boston academia and the military occupation of Baghdad. What was surprising to me, during the writing process, talking over the Baghdad sections with Gav or revising his first drafts as he revised mine, was how similar the two worlds were. The insularity, the boredom, the struggle to meaningfully connect one’s actions with a broader purpose. Perhaps the strangest thing readers might find about our depiction of the Iraq War is how relatable the experience is, and how the characters in the Baghdad sections, Mickey especially, but also Ant and a few others, could just as easily have been the focal point of the Boston chapters.
Phil Klay: Speaking of those two worlds, would you rather be trapped at a cocktail party with academics or with active duty military?
Chris: Can it be a cage match instead of a cocktail party, and can I be outside the Octagon watching?
Gavin: [Laughs] I’d go with JAG captains--military lawyers are just really fun to be around. I never really fit in in the infantry for personality reasons, plus the infantry’s a sausage fest. Academics can be fun, too, but if there’s one thing I hate it’s intellectual dick-measuring, and that can be a problem with academics and cocktails.
Chris: I’ve hung out with JAGs and other military, through Gavin, and I’ve found them to be focused outward more than inward. And though they may have worries that American military policy has been disastrous in some ways, that doesn’t usually manifest as a doubt about the value of their own service. Which is refreshing. Academics and writers, myself included, sometimes have this deep existential fear that their work doesn’t have real value when set next to famine, race riots, terrorism, wealth inequality, or even exotic bird smuggling. And I’m not holding myself immune to these insecurities. Of course, academics are my tribe. It’s hard to pass up a good conversation about Kafka’s influence on Borges. They’re nerds at heart, just passionate about books instead of computers. They’re people always in search of the right rabbit hole to go down. And eager to share what they dig up at the next cocktail party. It’s a great way to move through life, in my opinion. But there’s an overlap between these groups, too. This is why I like hanging out with Gavin, and with you, Phil. Best of both worlds.
Phil Klay: That’s a nice segue into the topic of friendship, one of the central themes of the book. Did writing the book put a strain on your friendship? What was the worst fight you had while working on the book?
Gavin: It did put a strain on the friendship at times, because Chris and I came at this project from very different places. Chris is so ambitious and driven about writing, and put years of his life into this book. I had a full time job and didn’t personally identify as a fiction writer, so for me, writing was a fun thing to do with Chris. I remember the week in the fall of 2013 when our agent started selling it—I’d just started a job as an Army prosecutor and was neck deep in all these new cases when I started having to take all these conference calls with prospective editors and things like that—it was exciting but also surreal since the book seemed to be so distant from my actual life. I didn’t really hang out with writers aside from Chris, and people I worked with didn’t know I’d been writing a book for years. At times it became serious work—this was way before we were anywhere near a finished manuscript—and I didn’t want to use my weekends and evenings on it, so I’d run and hide while Chris was blowing up my spot trying to get me to draft this or that scene. I felt bad about it at times, because I was letting down the cause, but I really didn’t want a second job.
Chris: I did hound him. I mean, Gav would stop responding to emails and texts! And I’d be like, Yo, asshole, if you can’t get this chapter done by when you said you would, then tell me so. Don’t just disappear. I mean, he did have a lot more responsibilities than I did, being a homeless poet bouncing between artist colonies for three years. Eventually we figured out a civil way for me pressure him into writing. We’d find a deadline he could actually meet and I’d check in every few days. And if he was just too busy, I’d say, Screw it, I’m writing the first draft of this Baghdad scene myself.
Gavin: Those were kind of meta struggles, you know? We never really fought about the content of the book. Chris is really generous with creative control given his huge investment in WotE, but also we just generally think along the same lines when it comes to fiction. I’m also happy to compromise or give stuff up when Chris thinks it’s not working, so we really don’t have the kinds of control struggles that other writers tend to imagine would happen with a collaborative novel. The only time I really dug in my heels was against you, Phil!
Phil Klay: [Laughs]
Gavin:I had some issues with the Tricia character and I had to cling white-knuckled to a scene or two because Chris was totally in favor of your suggestion.
Chris: What was that suggestion? Something about toning down a passage that was potentially offensive?
Gavin: I don’t even remember. I just remember clenching my fist and saying, I’ll show you, Phil Klay!
Chris: [laughs]
Phil Klay: Are there ways in which you two depend on each other, weaknesses in your writing that you’re willing to admit to?
Gavin:It generally takes a lot of ambition, focus, and ego to write a novel, and I tend to lack all three. It’s OK though, because Chris supplies them for the team. Basically, I’m a slacker. That should change in about a month when we start writing together full time.
Chris: I have a tendency to be overly controlled. A bit OCD. I’ll make really complicated spreadsheets outlining where every character is every hour of the fictional timeline, which in WotE spans almost a year--with notes about about the plot developments in each scene, which themes are hit, where the narrative perspective is. I’ll even track the scenes that happen off camera, scenes that exist in the novel only through references the characters make to past events. All this can really deaden the narrative. But then Gavin will start writing unplanned scenes, scenes not in the outline, and we’ll have to adjust. His lack of focus is an essential balance to my hyper-focus.
Gavin: Chris also had a tendency to be overly poetic.
Chris: You mean you’re overly restrained!
Gavin: [Laughs]. Yeah, that’s another nice balancing act in our collaboration. I think in the end, the prose in WotE has a constant lyrical pulse without becoming florid and sacrificing readability.
Chris: Yeah, it’s nice to be able to throw your flaws against someone else’s flaws and produce something you’re proud of. How lucky are we?
Review "Mr. Robinson and Mr. Kovite have…written a captivating coming-of-age novel that is, by turns, funny and sad and elegiac — a novel that leaves us with some revealing snapshots of America, both at war and in denial, and some telling portraits of a couple of millennials trying to grope their way toward adulthood. (Michiko Kakutani New York Times) “One of the most revealing novels yet about the millennial generation…Recent war fiction—like Kevin Powers’s The Yellow Birds, Phil Klay’s Redeployment, and Ben Fountain’s Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk—has accounted for the battleground overseas and at home, but none has focused so incisively on the choice between serving and shopping. Getting drunk at brunch and releasing your gun’s safety. Montauk and Corderoy keep in touch by editing a Wikipedia entry about themselves. What starts off as a fun, absurd exercise grows more poetic and deadly serious…The millennials have gotten a bad reputation for a bewildering sense of self-regard and privilege, their dreams encouraged by their protective parents and discouraged by the recession. And this might be their defining novel—what feels like a human encyclopedia, its opposing entries revealing characters and a country in a confused state of revision following a nonsensical war.” (Benjamin Percy Esquire) “The book is a love story, a war story and also a generational one, about coming of age in the time of Wikipedia and YouTube… darkly funny and absurd and terrifying at the same time.” (Wall Street Journal) "Only a poet and a soldier—like these collaborating authors—are mad enough or ambitious enough to conceive of this smart, wise and wise-assed first novel. Seattle hipsterville to Baghdad, Cambridge theory nerds and Army grunts, this book has sweep and heart and humor. It captures coming of age during foreign wars and domestic malaise, and it does so with electrifying insight." (Mary Karr author of The Liars' Club, Cherry, and Lit) “As bizarre, hilarious and devastating as the past decade, War of the Encyclopaedists offers a brilliant portrait of America in the early years of the Iraq War. A startling, original accomplishment, Christopher Robinson and Gavin Kovite's novel is simultaneously a coming-of-age story, a war story, and a story of the disaffected millennial generation for whom the war hardly happened at all.” (Phil Klay author of Redeployment) “The 429-page novel races, thanks to its accessible emotional depth. The distorted Wikipedia page tracks Montauk and Corderoy’s peaks and valleys with a poetic eye that warrants a deeper, careful reading that Corderoy and Montauk themselves might mock (or laud) depending on their mood.” (The Seattle Times) “[A] likable, highly readable, double-bylined coming-of-age first novel…Chapters alternate between Corderoy's ill-prepared and humorous immersion in lit-crit seminars and his friend's hard-edged life amid the threats and slaughter of insurgency. Both areas have fun with the lingo…There are many nice touches in the writing…Smart and entertaining.” (Kirkus, STARRED REVIEW) “[Robinson and Kovite] have taken their individual histories and attitudes and invested them in their two main characters, who are deftly portrayed and a perfect fit for each other. Their story unfolds rapidly, humorously, and convincingly from page one.” (Library Journal) “Kovite and Robinson perfectly capture the mistakes, confusion and vulnerability of early adulthood, as well as the bravado used to mask them...Bittersweet but ultimately redemptive, the Encyclopaedists' adventures in growing up, romantic failures and gaining perspective may remind readers of the pains and possibilities that are encountered when one makes a way in the world.” (Shelf Awareness) "An epic for the 9/11 generation, War of the Encyclopaedists chronicles the churning uncertainties of new adults, when everything represents possibility or peril." (Booklist) “A gripping, thoughtful read…Moving and memorable.” (Publishers Weekly) “A breath of fresh air. War of the Encyclopaedists is the extraordinary product of a collaboration between two writers… more entertaining than your standard important-yet-dreary war novel… By placing Mickey and Halifax in separate locations, enduring distinct experiences, their voices can do something amazing: have a completely unpedantic intra-generational conversation.” (The Daily Public)
About the Author Christopher Robinson, a Boston University and Hunter College MFA graduate, is a MacDowell Colony fellow and a Yale Younger Poets Prize finalist. His writing has appeared in many publications, including The Kenyon Review and McSweeney’s.
Where to Download War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite
Most helpful customer reviews
6 of 6 people found the following review helpful. Politically probing, funny, tender, extremely moving - all of the above. By Timothy J. Bazzett WAR OF THE ENCYCLOPAEDISTS, by Christopher Robinson & Gavin Kovite.This novel is a fascinating experiment in co-writing that 'totally works,' as someone much younger than I might say. And that's probably a good way to begin, since I'm pretty sure ENCYCLOPAEDISTS is directed at a much younger audience than me. Full disclosure: I'm seventy-one, and this is a book about twenty-somethings, and it provided me with a great peek into their world in the early years of the twenty-first century. And it's a confusing one. Call this a guy-sorta BFF book, okay? Except I'm not really sure about the 'forever' part, because, in my experience, guys don't often maintain those early best friendships. The BFF is more of a gal-thing, I think.But I started to comment on the successfulness of the co-writer thing. I'm trying to think of the last time I read such a good book written by two people. I'm digging way back even, and all I can come up with right off the top of my head is Nordhoff and Hall's Mutiny on the Bounty, and boy was that a long time ago! First published in the thirties, although I read it back in the sixties.Although I'm pretty sure grad student Halifax Corderoy and Army 1LT Mickey Montauk bear little resemblance to Fletcher Christian and Captain Bligh, they are a couple of pretty engaging characters, and, even though their story takes place in 2004-2005 time frame, I chuckled my way through some of the 'guy things' in here, both civilian and military, that I remember from my own youthful years (civilian and military, as I've been both soldier [twice] and grad student) in the sixties and seventies. So yeah, many of the familiar 'rites of passage' I recognized: the drinking, the bonding by puking together, the solitary sex (the 'sock on the doorknob' cracked me up). It was the other stuff - video games, internet surfing, online porn, the casual sex and aimlessness - that I had trouble relating to. Wrong generation, obviously.What this book does best, I think, is to show the disconnect between the civilian populace (represented by Hal Corderoy and the girl, Mani) and the all-volunteer army (Montauk and the men in his unit). Mani, Hal's girlfriend and Mickey's wife (you'll have to read the book to get this), says it pretty well in a letter to Mickey, calling the Iraq conflict "this weirdly fake war" -"Nobody around here even thinks about it except to think how stupid it is, and how much they're embarrassed by it, and how much they hate Bush, of course."And therein lies the dramatic tension that binds this co-authored book together. Hal, blundering his way along as a grad school dropout, maybe in love with his best friend's wife. And Mickey, trying to deal with the dangerous realities of his deployment to Baghdad while still grappling with his feelings for Mani. The book is laid out in sections alternating between Boston and Baghdad's mean - and deadly - streets. And each section ends with a philosophical, often angry or irreverent Wikipedia entry for "The Encyclopaedists," a roundabout way for Hal and Mickey to keep in touch.This is quite a book. It really is. Politically probing, funny, tender, at times extremely moving. It paints a poignant picture of a generation enduring many of the normal rites of passage, sometimes marking time, other times moving forward - trying to figure out what comes next. And the biggest mystery is how two guys managed to write this great book together, how seamlessly it all fits together. That's one hell of a hat trick, ya know? And my hat is off to Robinson and Kovite. They may not turn out to be this century's Nordhoff and Hall, but then again ...? Very highly recommended. (Four and a half stars - I'd have given it five, but I'm just not quite the right generation.)- Tim Bazzett, author of the Cold War memoir, SOLDIER BOY: AT PLAY IN THE ASA
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful. Two fine writers for the price of one. By Sue Kichenside War of the Encyclopaedists takes today's trend for the dual narrative to its logical conclusion: this is a book about two young men written BY two young men. One assumes that the authors were each responsible for one of the respective characters, Mickey Montauk and the rather fabulously named Halifax Corderoy, bright young men and best friends.Montauk shares a large Seattle house - the 'Encyclopad' - where he and Hal throw a series of achingly cool 'Encyclopaedists' parties, ironic affairs of local legend. At the last of these before their futures call, Hal's ambivalent feelings towards his exotic but wayward girlfriend Mani reach a turning point. As a reservist officer, Montauk has been called up to lead a platoon in Iraq (this is set in 2004/5) while Hal is off to study Lit Crit in Boston. But it's not just geography that is about to separate the two friends; the stage is set for something - or rather, someone - else to come between them. Just before the parting of the ways, they put together an entry on Wikipedia; this is the way they will communicate with one another. The Wiki pages serve to demarcate the two narrative arcs.The two authors interweave the threads of the story seamlessly in this collaborative novel. (I would love to know how they achieved this!) Their writing is just the right side of smart without being in the least showoff-y. Montauk's deployment in Iraq conveys the utter futility of the American mission, without recourse to histrionics. This is exemplified in a series of interview reports he conducts in a murder enquiry which make the point most effectively. Lt Montauk means well - but does he make good? Meanwhile Hal, broke and increasingly reliant on booze, is finding his post-grad course equally - if less momentously - futile. Christopher Robinson and Gavin Kovite have woven an interesting late coming-of-age story that sheds light on the American malaise of "no good deed going unpunished". Warmly recommended.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful. Uneven plot and unlikable characters By Nancy in New Jersey The characters were mostly interesting but the plot was uneven--not so much slow, steady or fast as choppy. Some parts were fascinating and flowed well, but other times the story jumped around for no apparent reason. And I found it hard to like any of the characters, which, for me, meant I didn't really care what happened to them by the end. And I didn't find the Wikipedia entries clever enough though I liked the idea. It may have been in part the problem of reading them on a Kindle, where I couldn't change the font and had to use a magnifying glass to be able to see them clearly. But when I did read them, they didn't think they added enough interesting or intriguing insights to the story.
See all 25 customer reviews... War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin KoviteWar of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite PDF
War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite iBooks
War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite ePub
War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite rtf
War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite AZW
War of the Encyclopaedists: A Novel, by Christopher Robinson, Gavin Kovite Kindle
